Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 47.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | LG |
| Android 4.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 6.06 x 3.03 x 0.39 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.78 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 720 x 1280 pixels (HD) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| IPS LCD | OLED |
| 277 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 8 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S4 MSM8625Q chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 203 (245 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 6.38 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 3 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 2300mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 180 hours standby time 6 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.24 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 3.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a lot better than Micromax Canvas Duet II, having a general score of 83.7 against 47.4. LG V50 ThinQ's construction is somewhat heavier but somewhat thinner than Micromax Canvas Duet II. Both phones in this review use Android operating system, but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Micromax Canvas Duet II has Android 4.1, so it gives you some additional features.
LG V50 ThinQ has a little bit better screen than Micromax Canvas Duet II, because it has a bigger screen, a way greater display pixels density and a lot higher 1440 x 3120 resolution. The LG V50 ThinQ has much more memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Micromax Canvas Duet II, because it has a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V50 ThinQ has a better performing CPU than Micromax Canvas Duet II, because although it has doesn't have a graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher amount of RAM and more cpu cores. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a much better camera than Micromax Canvas Duet II, because it has a lot better resolution back camera.
LG V50 ThinQ features a really longer battery duration than Micromax Canvas Duet II, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
LG V50 ThinQ not only is the best phones of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.