Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Xcover
S5690, S5690L| Global Score | |
| 47.3 | 51.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Micromax | Samsung |
| Android 4.2.2 | Android 2.3.6, 2.3.4 |
| -- | 2011-08-10 |
| -- | 4.80 x 2.60 x 0.47 inches |
| -- | 4.80 ounces |
| -- | Gray |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 155.00 | $ 115.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.5 inches | 3.6 inches |
| 480 x 854 pixels | 320 x 480 pixels |
| IPS LCD | TFT |
| 218 pixels per inch | 160 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 7.6 | 6.6 |
| Performance | |
| Broadcom BCM23550 chipset | -- |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Quad-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Marvell MG2 (Single-Core 800 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 512 MB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Yes GPU |
| 8.01 | 7.11 |
| Storage | |
| 4 GB internal memory | 163,84 MB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 3.82 | 2.02 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 3.20 MP |
| 1280 x 720 (30 fps) (HD) video resolution | 640 x 480 (30 fps) (VGA) video resolution |
| 6.93 | 5.61 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 4 | 4.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1800mAh Battery | 1500mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 150 hours standby time 5 hours talk time | 500 hours standby time 15 hours talk time |
| 3.68 | 3.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Xcover has an overall score of 51.9, which is a bit better than Micromax MAd A94's global score of 47.3. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy Xcover has the older 2.3.6 version while Micromax MAd A94 has Android 4.2.2 version. The Micromax MAd A94 features a better looking display than Samsung Galaxy Xcover, because it has a better screen pixel density, a lot better 854 x 480 resolution and a larger screen.
The Micromax MAd A94 has a superior performance than Galaxy Xcover, and although they both have a 512 MB RAM memory, the Micromax MAd A94 also has a greater number of cores (and also faster). The Micromax MAd A94 counts with a very superior camera than Galaxy Xcover, because it has a lot more mega-pixels back camera and a way higher 1280x720 video quality.
Micromax MAd A94 counts with a superior storage for applications and games than Galaxy Xcover, and although they both have a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 32 GB, the Micromax MAd A94 also has 4 GB internal memory. The Micromax MAd A94 has improved battery duration than Galaxy Xcover, because it has a 20 percent more battery capacity.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy Xcover is also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.