Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 57.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | LG |
| Windows Phone 8.1 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| -- | 2019-05-10 |
| 4.74 x 2.49 x 0.42 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 4.51 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Orange | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 249.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 480 x 800 pixels | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| LCD | OLED |
| 233 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.6 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 200 8212 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A7 (Dual-Core 1200 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 302 (400 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 8.1 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.62 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 2.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.20 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.2 inches (1/5") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 5.94 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Micro SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 4.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 456 hours standby time 12.9 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.28 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has a score of 83.7, which is a lot better than Microsoft Lumia 430's 57.4 general score. The LG V50 ThinQ design is incredibly heavier but much thinner than the Microsoft Lumia 430. LG V50 ThinQ works with Android 10 OS, while Microsoft Lumia 430 has Windows Phone 8.1 OS. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a sharper screen than Lumia 430, because it has a way greater pixel density, a much bigger screen and a much better 1440 x 3120 resolution.
LG V50 ThinQ counts with a better CPU than Lumia 430, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with more RAM memory and 6 more cores. The LG V50 ThinQ takes much better photos and videos than Lumia 430, because it has a back camera with a lot higher 12 MP resolution, a way larger sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos and a much bigger diafragm aperture to take better low-light photography and videos.
The LG V50 ThinQ has much more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Lumia 430, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and an external SD slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. The LG V50 ThinQ features a very superior battery duration than Lumia 430, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the LG V50 ThinQ is also cheaper than the Microsoft Lumia 430.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.