Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Vivo |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.98 x 3.09 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.82 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 325.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.7 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 515 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.4 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (1600 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.34 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3340mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 25 hours talk time | -- |
| 5.28 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Vivo X70 Pro is just a bit better than Lumia 950 XL, with a 78.3 score against 75. The vivo X70 Pro design is extremely newer and just a bit thinner, but also heavier than Lumia 950 XL. The vivo X70 Pro has Android 11 operating system, and Lumia 950 XL comes with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
Vivo X70 Pro has a more powerful processing unit than Lumia 950 XL, because it has a larger number of cores (and also faster) and 9 GB more RAM memory. The Lumia 950 XL features a sharper display than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The vivo X70 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal storage. Vivo X70 Pro takes much better photos and videos than Lumia 950 XL, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a much better resolution camera, better 60 fps video frame rate, a larger aperture to capture better low light photos and a way bigger back camera sensor capturing way better quality videos and photographs.
The vivo X70 Pro features improved battery performance than Microsoft Lumia 950 XL, because it has a 33% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.