Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 74.1 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Vivo |
| Windows 10 Mobile | Android 11 |
| 2015-10-06 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.71 x 2.88 x 0.32 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.29 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Plastic | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 309.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.6 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (933 MHz) RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 418 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 8.19 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 200 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 8.56 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.90 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| 0.42 inches (1/2.4") sensor | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 10.23 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 7.1 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3000mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 288 hours standby time 23 hours talk time | -- |
| 4.96 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X70 Pro has an overall score of 78.3, which is a bit better than the Lumia 950's 74.1 overall score. Vivo X70 Pro is a incredibly newer and just a bit thinner phone than the Lumia 950, although it's heavier. Vivo X70 Pro counts with Android 11 operating system, while Lumia 950 counts with Windows 10 Mobile operating system.
The vivo X70 Pro has a quite better performance than Lumia 950, because it has a larger number of cores (and faster) and 9 GB more RAM. The Lumia 950 has a sharper screen than vivo X70 Pro, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a higher pixels density.
The vivo X70 Pro has a much better camera than Microsoft Lumia 950, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the vivo X70 Pro also has a back-facing camera with a much better 50 mega pixels resolution, faster video frame rates, a way bigger sensor shooting way better quality videos and photographs and a bigger aperture for better low-light captures and videos.
Vivo X70 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Lumia 950, because although it has no slot for external memory cards, it also counts with 256 GB internal memory. Vivo X70 Pro features a really longer battery duration than Lumia 950, because it has a 48 percent bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.