Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2019-12-04 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 540.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 396 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is slightly better than the Motorola One Hyper, getting a score of 85.3 against 79.8. Although the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is notably heavier than the Motorola One Hyper, it's a lot thinner and also newer. These phones work with the same Android 11 operating system. Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 cpu cores, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has more RAM memory.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has just a bit better screen than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have a greater amount of pixels per display inch, the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 also has a much higher resolution of 1892 x 2688 and a bigger screen. The Motorola One Hyper has a superior memory for applications and games than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD memory slot that admits up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One Hyper captures much better photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture and lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a camera with lot more mega-pixels.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4449mAh of battery capacity.
Although Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Motorola One Hyper. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Motorola One Hyper, giving up some specs and features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.