Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Vivo |
| Android 11 | Android 11 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2021-09-30 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.23 x 2.88 x 0.31 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 6.49 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Aurora Down and Cosmic black |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2376 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 (6 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 16.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.01 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 4450mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has a general score of 85.3, which is a little bit better than the vivo X70 Pro's global score of 78.3. Microsoft Surface Duo 2's construction is notably thinner but a lot heavier than vivo X70 Pro, and both of them were only released 0 months apart. Both devices in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 OS, so both should give you identical OS features.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 counts with a slightly better display than vivo X70 Pro, because it has a higher resolution of 1892 x 2688 pixels, a just a bit greater screen density and a bigger screen. The vivo X70 Pro has a much better memory to store more games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 128 GB more internal storage.
The vivo X70 Pro has a bit faster processor than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the vivo X70 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The vivo X70 Pro captures greater photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, and although they both have the same video frame rate, a F1.7 aperture and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the vivo X70 Pro also has a back facing camera with a way better resolution.
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 and the vivo X70 Pro count with incredibly similar batteries performance, although the vivo X70 Pro also has a 0 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.