Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 85.3 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Microsoft | Xiaomi |
| Android 11 | Android 14 |
| 2021-09-20 | 2024-09-26 |
| 5.72 x 7.26 x 0.22 inches | 6.31 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 10.02 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Glacier and Obsidian | Titan Black, Titan Blue and Titan Gray |
| Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 540.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 8.3 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2688 x 1892 pixels | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 396 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| 800 cd/m2 brightness | 4000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.8 | 10.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9300+ (4 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Immortalis-G720 MC12 GPU |
| 9.63 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.70 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 27.00mm focal length | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.76 inches (1/1.31") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 10.01 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4449mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is slightly better than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, having a general score of 85.3 against 84.5. Despite of the fact the Microsoft Surface Duo 2 is extremely older and way heavier than the Xiaomi 14T Pro, it's design is still thinner. Both of these devices work with Android operating system, but Microsoft Surface Duo 2 has older 11 version while Xiaomi 14T Pro has Android 14.
Microsoft Surface Duo 2 features a really superior performance than Xiaomi 14T Pro, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Xiaomi 14T Pro has a much better display than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because although it has a little smaller display and a quite lower 1220 x 2712px resolution, it also counts with a way brighter display and a little bit greater pixels density.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro captures much better photos and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a back facing camera with a lot better resolution and a larger aperture to capture better low light photos. Xiaomi 14T Pro counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity.
The Xiaomi 14T Pro features just a little better battery duration than Microsoft Surface Duo 2, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 4449mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.