Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 58.8 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 2.3.5, 2.3.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-10-11 | 2020-04-16 |
| 4.96 x 2.59 x 0.40 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 5.18 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 299.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| TI OMAP4430 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A9 (Dual-Core 1000 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| PowerVR SGX540 (Dual-Core 304 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 8.01 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 8 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 4.62 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 7.26 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 3.9 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1785mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 382 hours standby time 8.5 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Moto G Stylus is way better than Motorola ATRIX 2, getting a 79.7 score against 58.8. The Moto G Stylus construction is a lot newer and thinner than Motorola ATRIX 2's, although it's also much heavier. Both of these devices include Android OS, but the Moto G Stylus has the previous 11 version while Motorola ATRIX 2 has Android 2.3.5 version.
Motorola Moto G Stylus features a better processing power than Motorola ATRIX 2, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processing unit, it also counts with a higher number of cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Motorola Moto G Stylus has just a bit better looking display than Motorola ATRIX 2, because it has a much greater pixel density, a way bigger screen and a much better resolution of 1080 x 2300.
Moto G Stylus counts with a very superior camera than Motorola ATRIX 2, because it has a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution. The Moto G Stylus counts with a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola ATRIX 2, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Moto G Stylus counts with a very superior battery life than Motorola ATRIX 2, because it has a 124% greater battery size.
The Moto G Stylus costs a little more money than the Motorola ATRIX 2, but you can get a much better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.