Search


Compare phones

Global Score
4447.8
Basic Information
MotorolaSamsung
Android 2.1Android 2.3.6
2010-07-072012-03-06
3.87 x 2.65 x 0.45 inches4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches
3.88 ounces3.42 ounces
Scratch-Resistant Glass--
$ 155.00$ 80.00
Display / Screen
2.8 inches2.8 inches
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA)240 x 320 pixels (QVGA)
TFTTFT
143 pixels per inch143 pixels per inch
Capacitive, Multi-touchCapacitive, Multi-touch
6.26.4
Single-Core 600 MHz processor Single-Core 832 MHz processor
GPU GPU
6.757.02
Storage
524,29 MB internal memory3 GB internal memory
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slotmicroSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot
2.423.52
Camera
3.00 MP2.00 MP
--320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution
5.065.06
Networks
Wi-FiWi-Fi
HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSMHSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM
SIMSIM
3.53.4
Battery Life
1170mAh Li-Ion Battery1200mAh Li-Ion Battery
Removable BatteryRemovable Battery
267 hours standby time
6.8 hours talk time
520 hours standby time
15.8 hours talk time
2.82.88
Other Features
Bluetooth 2.0, EDRBluetooth 3.0
GPSGPS
Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity SensorAccelerometer and Compass
FM Radio--

Comparison review

The Galaxy Pocket has a score of 47.8, which is a little bit better than the Motorola CHARM's general score of 44. Galaxy Pocket's body is newer and somewhat lighter, but just a bit thicker than the Motorola CHARM. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy Pocket has the newer 2.3.6 version and Motorola CHARM has Android 2.1 version, providing a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.

The Galaxy Pocket features a little sharper screen than Motorola CHARM. Both of them have a screen with the same size, a greater number of pixels per inch of display and the same exact resolution of 320 x 240. Galaxy Pocket counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola CHARM. Both of them have the same number of cores.

The Galaxy Pocket counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola CHARM, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 32 GB, the Galaxy Pocket also has 3 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Pocket counts with just a little better battery life than Motorola CHARM, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity.

The Galaxy Pocket features a camera that is very similar to the camera in Motorola CHARM, although the Galaxy Pocket has a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera.

Samsung Galaxy Pocket not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.




Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.