Global Score | |
44 | 47.8 |
Basic Information | |
Motorola | Samsung |
Android 2.1 | Android 2.3.6 |
2010-07-07 | 2012-03-06 |
3.87 x 2.65 x 0.45 inches | 4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches |
3.88 ounces | 3.42 ounces |
Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
$ 155.00 | $ 80.00 |
Display / Screen | |
2.8 inches | 2.8 inches |
320 x 240 pixels (QVGA) | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
TFT | TFT |
143 pixels per inch | 143 pixels per inch |
Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
6.2 | 6.4 |
Single-Core 600 MHz processor | Single-Core 832 MHz processor |
GPU | GPU |
6.75 | 7.02 |
Storage | |
524,29 MB internal memory | 3 GB internal memory |
microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
2.42 | 3.52 |
Camera | |
3.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
-- | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
5.06 | 5.06 |
Networks | |
Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
SIM | SIM |
3.5 | 3.4 |
Battery Life | |
1170mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
267 hours standby time 6.8 hours talk time | 520 hours standby time 15.8 hours talk time |
2.8 | 2.88 |
Other Features | |
Bluetooth 2.0, EDR | Bluetooth 3.0 |
GPS | GPS |
Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Compass |
FM Radio | -- |
The Galaxy Pocket has a score of 47.8, which is a little bit better than the Motorola CHARM's general score of 44. Galaxy Pocket's body is newer and somewhat lighter, but just a bit thicker than the Motorola CHARM. Both devices in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Galaxy Pocket has the newer 2.3.6 version and Motorola CHARM has Android 2.1 version, providing a lot of extra features and performance optimizations.
The Galaxy Pocket features a little sharper screen than Motorola CHARM. Both of them have a screen with the same size, a greater number of pixels per inch of display and the same exact resolution of 320 x 240. Galaxy Pocket counts with a little faster processing unit than Motorola CHARM. Both of them have the same number of cores.
The Galaxy Pocket counts with a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola CHARM, and although they both have a slot for external memory cards that holds a maximum of 32 GB, the Galaxy Pocket also has 3 GB internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy Pocket counts with just a little better battery life than Motorola CHARM, because it has a 3 percent bigger battery capacity.
The Galaxy Pocket features a camera that is very similar to the camera in Motorola CHARM, although the Galaxy Pocket has a much less megapixels resolution back-facing camera.
Samsung Galaxy Pocket not only is the best phones between the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one.
Despite our efforts to provide accurate information in our reviews and specs, there may be errors or missing information in this website, please check the specifications the brand or seller provide with the product before you buy it. We are not responsible for any inconvinience resulting on the use of this website's information.
Certain content that appears on this site comes from Amazon Services LLC. This content is provided 'as is' and is subject to change or removal at any time.