Compare phones
Motorola Cliq XT
MB501Samsung Galaxy Pocket
S5300| Global Score | |
| 46 | 47.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 1.5 | Android 2.3.6 |
| 2010-02-15 | 2012-03-06 |
| 4.59 x 2.34 x 0.48 inches | 4.08 x 2.26 x 0.47 inches |
| 4.36 ounces | 3.42 ounces |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 100.00 | $ 80.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 2.8 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 240 x 320 pixels (QVGA) |
| TFT | TFT |
| 186 pixels per inch | 143 pixels per inch |
| Yes | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.2 | 6.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm MSM7200A chipset | -- |
| Single-Core 528 MHz processor | Single-Core 832 MHz processor |
| 256 MB RAM | -- |
| GPU | GPU |
| 6.66 | 7.02 |
| Storage | |
| 262,14 MB internal memory | 3 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot |
| 2.12 | 3.52 |
| Camera | |
| 5.00 MP | 2.00 MP |
| -- | 320 x 240 (15 fps) (QVGA) video resolution |
| 5.5 | 5.06 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE and GSM | HSDPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM |
| SIM | SIM |
| 3.3 | 3.4 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1420mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 500 hours standby time 4.5 hours talk time | 520 hours standby time 15.8 hours talk time |
| 3.2 | 2.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 3.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer and Compass |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Pocket has a general score of 47.8, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Cliq XT's 46 global score. Samsung Galaxy Pocket's design is newer, a little bit thinner and incredibly lighter than the Motorola Cliq XT. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (operating system), but the Samsung Galaxy Pocket has a newer 2.3.6 version while Motorola Cliq XT has Android 1.5, so it counts with a couple nice extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy Pocket features a little sharper display than Motorola Cliq XT, although it has a just a little less pixels per inch in the display, a bit smaller screen and a way worse resolution of 320 x 240. The Galaxy Pocket has a very superior memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Cliq XT, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 32 GB, the Galaxy Pocket also has 3 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy Pocket features a little bit better performance than Motorola Cliq XT. They have the same number of cores. Motorola Cliq XT shoots slightly better videos and photos than Galaxy Pocket, because it has a much more megapixels camera. The Motorola Cliq XT has longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy Pocket, because it has a 1420mAh battery size.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we compare here, the Galaxy Pocket is also a bargain compared to the other devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.