Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 48.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 2.3.6 | -- |
| 2012-01-05 | 2017-10-19 |
| 4.29 x 2.30 x 0.49 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 3.77 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| TFT | AMOLED |
| 180 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 6.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7225A chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A5 (Single-Core 600 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 512 MB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (enhanced) (200 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 7.02 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 1.32 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP + 0.30 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| -- | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 640 x 480 (VGA) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 5.5 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| HSPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS and GSM | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 4 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1650mAh Li-Ion Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 504 hours standby time 10 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.52 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel 2 has a global score of 81.6, which is much better than the Motorola Defy Mini's general score of 48.4. Google Pixel 2 is a incredibly newer and way thinner cellphone than the Motorola Defy Mini, but it's heavier. The Google Pixel 2 has a lot better display than Motorola Defy Mini, because it has a lot better resolution of 1080 x 1920 pixels, a lot larger screen and a way higher display pixels density.
The Google Pixel 2 counts with a way better performance than Motorola Defy Mini, because although it has doesn't have a GPU, it also counts with more cpu cores and a greater amount of RAM memory. Google Pixel 2 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Defy Mini, because it has a camera with much more mega-pixels and a much better 3840x2160 video definition.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Defy Mini, although it has no SD extension slot. Google Pixel 2 features a very superior battery performance than Motorola Defy Mini, because it has a 2700mAh battery capacity.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, which makes this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.