Compare phones
Motorola Devour
A555ZTE Warp
N860| Global Score | |
| 39 | 45.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | ZTE |
| Android 1.6 | Android 2.3.5 |
| -- | 2011-10-20 |
| 4.55 x 2.40 x 0.61 inches | 5.10 x 2.70 x 0.45 inches |
| 6.35 ounces | 4.93 ounces |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 75.00 | $ 75.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 3.1 inches | 4.3 inches |
| 320 x 480 pixels | 480 x 800 pixels |
| TFT | TFT |
| 186 pixels per inch | 217 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 6.1 | 7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon S1 MSM7627 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon S2 MSM8655 chipset |
| processor | Single-Core 1000 MHz processor |
| -- | 512 MB RAM |
| Adreno 200 (128 MHz) GPU | Yes GPU |
| 5.76 | 7.38 |
| Storage | |
| -- | 4 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC external memory slot |
| 1.32 | 2.5 |
| Camera | |
| 3.00 MP | 5.00 MP |
| 640 x 480 (23 fps) (VGA) video resolution | -- |
| 5.61 | 5.5 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| EV-DO A and CDMA | EV-DO A and CDMA |
| 2.6 | 2.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1400mAh Li-Ion Battery | 1600mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| 443 hours standby time 6.5 hours talk time | 270 hours standby time 7.5 hours talk time |
| 3.12 | 3.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.0 | Bluetooth 2.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| Accelerometer | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
ZTE Warp has a score of 45.6, which is much better than Motorola Devour's 39 score. ZTE Warp is a extremely lighter and incredibly thinner phone than the Motorola Devour. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but the ZTE Warp has 2.3.5 version while Motorola Devour has Android 1.6 version.
ZTE Warp counts with a sharper display than Motorola Devour, because it has a way better 800 x 480 pixels resolution, a way larger screen and a little greater screen density. The ZTE Warp features much more storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Devour, although it has no SD memory slot.
The ZTE Warp features a very superior processing power than Motorola Devour, although it has doesn't have a graphics processing unit, they both have the same number of cores. ZTE Warp counts with superior battery duration than Motorola Devour, because it has a 1600mAh battery size instead of 1400mAh.
Motorola Devour features a bit better camera than ZTE Warp, although it has a camera in the back with way less mega-pixels resolution.
ZTE Warp costs the same than Motorola Devour, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.