Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.2 | 65.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Nokia |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 2.3.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2011-09-07 | 2020-09-23 |
| 5.02 x 2.63 x 0.43 inches | 6.53 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.60 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | Charcoal, Dusk and Fjord |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 165.00 | $ 139.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 256 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| -- | MediaTek Helio P22 MT6762 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | IMG PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 7.7 | 7.81 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1735mAh Li-Ion Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 200 hours standby time 10.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 2.4 is slightly better than the Motorola Droid Bionic, with a overall score of 65.6 against 60.2. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Nokia 2.4 has an older 11 version while Motorola Droid Bionic has Android 4.1.2. The Nokia 2.4 is a noticeably newer and notably thinner cellphone than the Motorola Droid Bionic, although it is heavier.
The Motorola Droid Bionic features a little bit better display than Nokia 2.4, although it has a bit lower display density, a really smaller screen and a much lower resolution of 960 x 540px. Nokia 2.4 features a better performing CPU than Motorola Droid Bionic, because it has a greater number of cores (and they are faster) and more RAM memory.
Nokia 2.4 features a way bigger memory to install games and applications than Motorola Droid Bionic, because it has 16 GB more internal storage and a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Nokia 2.4 has a very superior battery duration than Motorola Droid Bionic, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 1735mAh.
Nokia 2.4 captures a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Droid Bionic, and although they both have the same (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Nokia 2.4 also has a much larger aperture to capture better low-light images and videos and a camera with much more mega pixels.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Nokia 2.4 is also by far the cheapest one, which makes it an obvious call.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.