Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 60.2 | 83.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.1.2, 4.0.4, 2.3.4 | -- |
| 2011-09-07 | 2018-03-16 |
| 5.02 x 2.63 x 0.43 inches | 5.81 x 2.70 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.60 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Burgundy red, Coral blue, Ice blue, Lilac purple, Midnight black, Sunrise gold and Titanium gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 165.00 | $ 158.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 4.3 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 540 x 960 pixels | 2960 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 256 pixels per inch | 568 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 7.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| -- | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Dual-Core 1000 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 1 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Yes GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 7.65 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 16 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC (up to 32 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 400 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.72 | 11.34 |
| Camera | |
| 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 7.7 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), EV-DO A and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| -- | Nano SIM |
| 5.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 1735mAh Li-Ion Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 200 hours standby time 10.8 hours talk time | -- |
| 3.6 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 2.1, EDR | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| -- | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S9 is way better than Motorola Droid Bionic, getting an 83.3 score against 60.2. Galaxy S9 is a much newer and much thinner cellphone than the Motorola Droid Bionic, but it's also a bit heavier. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a very superior CPU than Motorola Droid Bionic, because it has a greater number of faster cores and a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S9 features a more vivid display than Motorola Droid Bionic, because it has way more pixels per display inch, a way larger display and a lot higher resolution of 1440 x 2960. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a way better camera than Motorola Droid Bionic, because it has a way bigger camera aperture to take better low-light images and video, a lot higher resolution back-facing camera and a much better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
Galaxy S9 features much more memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Droid Bionic, because it has more internal memory and an external memory slot that admits up to 400 GB. Samsung Galaxy S9 features a superior battery duration than Motorola Droid Bionic, because it has a 73% greater battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S9 is also a bit cheaper, making it an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.