Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| 2015-10-29 | 2017-11-03 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.09 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone X is better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with an 88.1 score against 75.4. The iPhone X is a newer and thinner cellphone than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but it's also a little heavier. Apple iPhone X has a better performing processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lower number of cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Apple iPhone X also counts with a 64-bits processor.
IPhone X counts with a bit better display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a bit lower 1125 x 2436 resolution and a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a little bit larger display. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a better storage for games and applications than Apple iPhone X, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that allows up to 1,95 TB.
IPhone X counts with a slightly better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a worse video definition and a much lower resolution back camera, it also counts with a larger aperture for better photography in low light environments. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a way better battery performance than Apple iPhone X, because it has a 38% larger battery size.
Although Apple iPhone X is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Apple iPhone X, else you can save some money and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, resigning a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.