Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Asus |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-07-23 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.73 x 3.07 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 8.47 ounces |
| Black and White | Black glare |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3090 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Yes GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Asus ROG Phone 3 is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, having an 86.3 score against 75.4. The Asus ROG Phone 3 design is much newer than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, although it's a lot heavier and a bit thicker. The Asus ROG Phone 3 counts with a bit more vivid display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a lot worse pixels quantity per inch in the screen and a little bit worse 1080 x 2340 resolution, it also counts with a larger screen.
Asus ROG Phone 3 features just a bit better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Asus ROG Phone 3 also has a larger amount of RAM. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Asus ROG Phone 3, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
The Asus ROG Phone 3 features a much longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity instead of 3760mAh. The Asus ROG Phone 3 captures much better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a much higher video quality, a bigger diafragm aperture and a much more mega pixels camera in the back.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.