Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 5.1 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2015-10-01 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| -- | Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 544 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.09 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 5.5 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 5.68 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V10 is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, with a 78.6 score against 75.4. Even though the LG V10 and the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 were released only 1 months apart, LG V10's construction is just a bit thinner but somewhat heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a bit better CPU than LG V10, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with 7 more cpu cores.
The LG V10 has a bit better screen than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a just a bit worse display pixels density, and they both have the same 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution, the LG V10 also counts with a little larger screen. LG V10 counts with as much memory capacity to store more apps and games as Motorola DROID Turbo 2, they have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity and a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V10 has a bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera in the back with a way lower 16 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a larger aperture. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with superior battery life than LG V10, because it has a 3760mAh battery size against 3000mAh.
Although LG V10 is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the LG V10, else you can save some dollars and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.