Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| -- | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2015-10-29 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and White | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
LG V50 ThinQ has an overall score of 83.7, which is much better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's 75.4 general score. The LG V50 ThinQ construction is noticeably newer and just a little thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, but it's a little bit heavier. LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the LG V50 ThinQ also has more RAM memory.
The LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better display than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a quite lower display pixels density, it also counts with a quite better 1440 x 3120 resolution and a bigger display. LG V50 ThinQ shoots slightly better photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video resolution and a camera with lot less megapixels resolution, it also counts with a lot larger camera aperture to take better photos and video in low light situations.
The LG V50 ThinQ has a better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1,95 TB, the LG V50 ThinQ also has 64 GB more internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ features just a bit better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 6 percent more battery size.
LG V50 ThinQ is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.