Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 76.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 14 |
| 2015-10-29 | -- |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.47 x 3.07 x 0.31 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black and White | Blue Black, Gold, Light Gray and Light Green |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 135.00 | $ 230.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Exynos 1330 (5 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Mali-G68 MP2 GPU |
| 9.09 | 6.03 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | -- |
| 9.79 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A16 5G has a score of 76.2, which is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's global score of 75.4. The Samsung Galaxy A16 5G construction is heavier but somewhat thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo 2. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much better performance than Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little sharper screen than Galaxy A16 5G, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels density and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. Samsung Galaxy A16 5G counts with a little bit more memory for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has an external memory slot that supports 1000 GB smaller, it also counts with more internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy A16 5G has improved battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 shoots slightly better photos and videos than Galaxy A16 5G, although it has a tinier aperture which is worse for low light captures and a camera in the back with a way worse 21 megapixels resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy A16 5G is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A16 5G, else you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.