Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| -- | Android 11, 10 |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-01-31 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black and White | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 14.66 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 5.5 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 is better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, getting a general score of 87.5 against 75.4. Galaxy A71 is a notably newer and thinner phone than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, although it's just a little heavier. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit more vivid display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a better screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a slightly bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy A71, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with a SD memory card expansion slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy A71 has just a little better processing power than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy A71 also has 3 GB more RAM memory.
The Galaxy A71 has greater battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has a 20% bigger battery size. Galaxy A71 takes a lot better videos and photos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 also has a back facing camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a larger aperture for better captures and video in poorly lited environments.
Although Samsung Galaxy A71 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy A71, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, letting go some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.