Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 75.4 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| 2015-10-29 | 2020-08-21 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black and White | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| -- | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 544 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.09 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.79 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 5.5 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.68 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than Motorola DROID Turbo 2's general score of 75.4. The Galaxy Note 20 design is much newer and just a bit thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2's, although it's somewhat heavier. Galaxy Note 20 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy Note 20 also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a bit better looking screen than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution and a higher display density. The Galaxy Note 20 shoots a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a way higher video definition and a larger camera aperture.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has a much better memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because it has 4300mAh of battery capacity instead of 3760mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola DROID Turbo 2. If you want to save some money, you can get the Motorola DROID Turbo 2, and give up a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.