Compare phones
Motorola Moto X (2014)
XT1092XT1092
| Global Score | |
| 74.8 | 73.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 5.1 | Android 5.0, 4.4.4 |
| 2015-10-27 | 2014-09-04 |
| 5.90 x 3.07 x 0.36 inches | 5.54 x 2.85 x 0.39 inches |
| 5.96 ounces | 5.08 ounces |
| Black and White | Gold |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 310.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.4 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 544 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.5 | 9.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 8974-AC chipset |
| ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 2000 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB RAM | 2 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 430 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 8.37 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 14.66 | 5.8 |
| Camera | |
| 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 29.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| -- | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, HSUPA, EV-DO A, EDGE, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 6 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3760mAh Battery | 2300mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.68 | 4.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.1 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is a little bit better than Moto X (2014), with a general score of 74.8 against 73.4. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is a newer and a little thinner cellphone than the Moto X (2014), although it is also somewhat heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Motorola DROID Turbo 2 has newer 5.1 version and Moto X (2014) has Android 5.0 version.
The Motorola Moto X (2014) features a better performing CPU than Motorola DROID Turbo 2, because although it has less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra GPU and a higher number of cores. Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a little more vivid display than Moto X (2014), because it has a greater pixel number per inch in the display, a bit bigger screen and a better 2560 x 1440px resolution.
Motorola DROID Turbo 2 counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Moto X (2014), because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD card slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 captures clearer photos and videos than Motorola Moto X (2014), and although they both have the same 30 fps video frame rate and the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola DROID Turbo 2 also has a way more mega pixels back facing camera and a larger camera aperture for better captures and video in low light situations.
The Motorola DROID Turbo 2 features a much longer battery lifetime than Motorola Moto X (2014), because it has 3760mAh of battery capacity instead of 2300mAh.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones we compare here, Motorola DROID Turbo 2 is also a bargain compared to the other ones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.