Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
IPhone 8 is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo, having a global score of 85 against 76.4. The iPhone 8 body is much newer, lighter and noticeably thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a sharper screen than Apple iPhone 8, because it has a little bigger display, a lot higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels and a way better amount of pixels per inch of screen.
Apple iPhone 8 has a much better storage to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 256 GB internal memory capacity. IPhone 8 counts with a bit superior CPU than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have a GPU and less RAM memory, it also counts with more CPU cores and a 64-bits processing unit.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a superior battery life than iPhone 8, because it has a 3900mAh battery size instead of 1821mAh. The Apple iPhone 8 has a little bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse (4K) video quality and a back camera with a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
Although Apple iPhone 8 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Apple iPhone 8, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.