Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo, with an 84.5 score against 76.4. The iPhone XS Max is a much newer and thinner cellphone than the Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's also heavier. Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit more vivid display than iPhone XS Max, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a quite greater pixel number per inch in the display and a bit higher 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
Apple iPhone XS Max has a bit more powerful CPU than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a 64-bit processing unit, more CPU cores (although they are slower) and a larger amount of RAM. IPhone XS Max features a slightly better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse 3840x2160 video quality and a back camera with much less MP, it also counts with a bigger aperture to take better low light captures and video.
Apple iPhone XS Max has much more storage capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal storage capacity. Motorola Droid Turbo counts with improved battery performance than iPhone XS Max, because it has a 3900mAh battery size against 3179mAh.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a few features and specifications, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.