Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2015-11-02 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 3.06 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Gold, Silver and White |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 649.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 810 MSM8994 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 430 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3450mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Nexus 6P is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, with a general score of 80.3 against 76.4. The Google Nexus 6P design is newer and a lot thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo's, although it's also just a bit heavier. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with just a bit better performance than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has less CPU cores , and they both have the same RAM amount, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an extra graphics processing unit.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid screen than Google Nexus 6P, because although it has a little bit smaller display, and they both have the same resolution of 2560 x 1440px, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a bit more pixels per inch in the screen. Google Nexus 6P counts with a much bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory capacity.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit superior battery lifetime than Google Nexus 6P, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity against 3450mAh. Google Nexus 6P counts with a camera that's just as good as the camera in Motorola Droid Turbo, and although the Google Nexus 6P has a lot worse resolution back camera and a worse 3840x2160 video definition, they both have the same aperture.
Although Google Nexus 6P is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Google Nexus 6P, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.