Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a little bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. The Google Pixel 2 is a newer phone, and it's also notably thinner and lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit faster CPU than Google Pixel 2, because although it has less cores and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better looking display than Google Pixel 2, because it has a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution, a better display pixel density and a little bigger screen. The Google Pixel 2 features a much bigger memory for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a little bit better camera than Google Pixel 2, because although it has lower 24 frames per second video frame rates and a smaller aperture, and they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a way more MP back facing camera.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a way better battery life than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 3900mAh battery capacity instead of 2700mAh.
Despite of being the best phone in our current comparison, Google Pixel 2 is also a lot cheaper, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.