Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel XL is a bit better than Motorola Droid Turbo, getting a global score of 81.3 against 76.4. The Google Pixel XL design is newer, just a little lighter and extremely thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo. Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit better processor than Google Pixel XL, because although it has lesser RAM memory, and they both have a Quad-Core processor, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have an equal resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a just a bit higher screen pixels density. The Motorola Droid Turbo takes a little bit better photos and videos than Google Pixel XL, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a same size camera aperture and the same 3840x2160 video definition, the Motorola Droid Turbo also counts with a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Google Pixel XL features a lot bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit superior battery performance than Google Pixel XL, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save some dollars, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.