Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with an 83.7 score against 76.4. Both phones we are comparing include Android OS (Operating System), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4. The LG V50 ThinQ body is newer and noticeably thinner, but also a little bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo.
LG V50 ThinQ features a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM and more CPU cores. Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a bit lower 2560 x 1440 resolution and a little smaller screen, it also counts with a bit greater count of pixels in each inch of screen.
LG V50 ThinQ features much more storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and more internal memory capacity. The LG V50 ThinQ has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a worse video definition and a way less megapixels back facing camera, it also counts with a way bigger camera aperture.
The LG V50 ThinQ costs more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's still a great choice, as you can get a lot more for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.