Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 565 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A32 is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with an 84.7 score against 76.4. Galaxy A32 has Android operating system, while Motorola Droid Turbo counts with Android 4.4.4 operating system. Galaxy A32's design is newer and somewhat thinner, but heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a much more vibrant screen than Galaxy A32, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better 2560 x 1440px resolution and a lot greater screen density. Galaxy A32 has a superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and lesser cores , it also counts with a GPU. The Galaxy A32 has greater battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy A32 captures a little bit better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a much more MP back facing camera, a bigger diafragm aperture to take better photos and videos in low-light situations and higher 30 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.