Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-10-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) has a general score of 84.2, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's global score of 76.4. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) is a newer cellphone, and it's also a little bit lighter and notably thinner than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo has a little faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a much better display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440. Samsung Galaxy A7 (2018) features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that admits up to 512 GB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has an 18 percent bigger battery capacity. Galaxy A7 (2018) and Motorola Droid Turbo both have similar cameras, and although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a higher resolution back camera, a bigger aperture for better low light captures and video and faster 30 frames per second video frame rates, they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.