Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 91.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-06-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.40 x 2.97 x 0.32 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Prism Cube black, Prism Cube blue and Prism Cube sliver |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 381.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is a lot better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, with a score of 91.8 against 76.4. Even though Samsung Galaxy A71 5G is just a little bit heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo, it's incredibly thinner and newer. These phones work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A71 5G has 11 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter screen than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a better pixels number per screen inch. Galaxy A71 5G features a much bigger storage to store more games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 96 GB more internal memory capacity and an external memory slot that admits a maximum of 1000 GB.
Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A71 5G, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory and lesser processing cores , it also counts with an additional GPU. The Samsung Galaxy A71 5G features just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Galaxy A71 5G captures much clearer pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video quality, the Galaxy A71 5G also has a way more megapixels camera in the back, faster video frame rates and a larger aperture to capture better low-light photos.
Galaxy A71 5G costs a lot more than Motorola Droid Turbo, but it's still a convenient choice, because you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.