Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 90.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-09-04 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.49 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| -- | Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A90 5G has a global score of 90.5, which is better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. Galaxy A90 5G's body is a lot newer and notably thinner, but somewhat heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo. The Galaxy A90 5G has Android operating system, and Motorola Droid Turbo comes with Android 4.4.4 operating system.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a sharper display than Galaxy A90 5G, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px. The Galaxy A90 5G counts with a little better hardware performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics co-processor, it also counts with a higher number of faster cores and 3 GB more RAM memory.
Galaxy A90 5G counts with much more memory capacity to store more apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a slot for an SD memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB and more internal storage. Samsung Galaxy A90 5G has just a little better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A90 5G captures better photographs and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have a same size camera aperture and the same (4K) video definition, the Galaxy A90 5G also has a lot more mega-pixels back camera and faster 30 fps video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.