Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 81 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-02-24 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.41 x 3.18 x 0.27 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and Gold |
| -- | Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 367 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 653 8976 Pro chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A72 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 28 nm (Octa-Core 1950 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 510 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy C9 Pro has a global score of 81, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 general score. The Galaxy C9 Pro is a newer and incredibly thinner cellphone than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it's also a little bit heavier. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy C9 Pro has 6.0 Marshmallow version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit superior CPU than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with an extra graphics co-processor. Motorola Droid Turbo features a way better display than Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 and a way better display pixels density.
The Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro features much more memory to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 256 GB. The Galaxy C9 Pro has just a little bit longer battery performance than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 4000mAh battery capacity.
The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a slightly better camera than Samsung Galaxy C9 Pro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 video quality and a lot higher resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.