Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 86.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-03-05 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M31 is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo, having a overall score of 86.5 against 76.4. Although Galaxy M31 is a bit heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's extremely thinner and also a lot newer. Both phones in our current comparison use Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M31 has an older 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy M31, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better count of pixels per display inch and a better 2560 x 1440 resolution. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy M31, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less processing cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit.
Galaxy M31 counts with a greater camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy M31 also has higher video frame rates, a back camera with a much higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a larger aperture to take better low-light photos.
Samsung Galaxy M31 features a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 64 GB internal storage and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy M31 counts with a superior battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.