Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 88 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-08-06 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 2.93 x 0.37 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mirage black and Mirage blue |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 6000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy M31s has a score of 88, which is much better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 overall score. Galaxy M31s's design is newer and somewhat thinner, but also somewhat heavier than Motorola Droid Turbo. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy M31s has the previous 11 version and Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features a more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 2560 x 1440px and a greater pixels density. Galaxy M31s has a superior memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 512 GB.
Motorola Droid Turbo has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy M31s, because although it has 3 GB lesser RAM memory and a lower number of cores (although they are faster), it also counts with a graphics processing unit. Galaxy M31s counts with a superior battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 54 percent larger battery size.
Galaxy M31s features a way better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, and although they both have the same video resolution, the Galaxy M31s also has a bigger diafragm aperture to take better images and videos in low light environments, higher 30 frames per second video frame rates and a much more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.