Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 78.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Sony |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-09-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.83 x 2.87 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Pink and Silver |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 424 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 19.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.45 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2700mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Xperia XZ1 has a general score of 78.3, which is a little bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's 76.4 global score. Xperia XZ1's construction is a lot newer, much thinner and somewhat lighter than Motorola Droid Turbo. The Motorola Droid Turbo features a brighter screen than Sony Xperia XZ1, and although they both have a same size display, the Motorola Droid Turbo also has a greater amount of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
The Motorola Droid Turbo features just a bit better performance than Xperia XZ1, because although it has a lower number of cores and lesser RAM memory, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Xperia XZ1 has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 32 GB more internal storage and a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Motorola Droid Turbo has a much better battery performance than Xperia XZ1, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity against 2700mAh. The Xperia XZ1 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Droid Turbo, although it has a lower video resolution and a camera in the back with a worse 19 megapixels resolution, they both have a same size aperture.
Although Sony Xperia XZ1 is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola Droid Turbo. If you are trying to save some money, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up a few features and specs, but you will get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.