Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 77.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Vivo |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2024-04-03 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.30 x 5.62 x 0.19 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.73 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black and White |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 179.00 | $ 1915.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 8 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2480 x 2200 pixels |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 414 pixels per inch |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 10.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 SM8650-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 5.8 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 23.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.77 inches (1/1.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 7.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | Infra-red port |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro has a global score of 77.8, which is a bit better than the Motorola Droid Turbo's score of 76.4. Although the vivo X Fold 3 Pro is heavier than the Motorola Droid Turbo, it's thinner and newer. Both phones we are comparing use Android operating system, but the vivo X Fold 3 Pro has the previous 14 version while Motorola Droid Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a little sharper display than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a lot lower pixels quantity per inch in the display, it also counts with a better resolution of 2200 x 2480 pixels and a really bigger screen. Motorola Droid Turbo features a very superior processor than vivo X Fold 3 Pro, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 lesser CPU cores (but faster), it also counts with an additional GPU.
Vivo X Fold 3 Pro captures a lot better pictures and videos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a much higher video resolution, a camera in the back with lot more mega pixels and a bigger diafragm aperture. Vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has more internal storage.
The vivo X Fold 3 Pro features a very superior battery duration than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a 5700mAh battery size against 3900mAh.
Although vivo X Fold 3 Pro is a better device, it is way more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Motorola Droid Turbo, letting go a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.