Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 76.4 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Xiaomi |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-08-29 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.12 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and Red |
| -- | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 179.00 | $ 415.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2246 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 32 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 5.8 | 16.38 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a general score of 85.5, which is much better than Motorola Droid Turbo's general score of 76.4. The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 construction is extremely newer and way thinner than the Motorola Droid Turbo's, but it is also just a bit heavier. The Motorola Droid Turbo counts with a more vivid screen than Xiaomi Pocophone F1, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440px and more pixels per display inch.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 features a little faster processing unit than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra graphics co-processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores and 5 GB more RAM. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 captures just a bit better videos and photos than Motorola Droid Turbo, because although it has a much worse 12 mega pixels resolution back-facing camera and a worse (4K) video resolution, it also counts with a larger diafragm aperture to take better low-light images and videos.
The Xiaomi Pocophone F1 has a very superior memory capacity for games and applications than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has a SD extension slot that allows up to 256 GB and more internal storage. Xiaomi Pocophone F1 counts with a bit better battery life than Motorola Droid Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Xiaomi Pocophone F1 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than Motorola Droid Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Droid Turbo. If you want to save some money, you can get Motorola Droid Turbo, and give up some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.