Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-09-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.45 x 2.65 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Red, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 849.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 4.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1334 x 750 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 326 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 2 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 28.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 1821mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 3.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone 8 has a general score of 85, which is a little bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's general score of 77.9. The iPhone 8 is a much newer device, and it is also somewhat lighter and much thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Motorola DROID Turbo features a more vivid display than iPhone 8, because it has a little bit larger screen, a lot higher pixels number per screen inch and a lot better 2560 x 1440 pixels resolution.
The iPhone 8 has a little bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU and 1 GB lesser RAM memory, it also counts with a larger number of cores and a 64-bit processing unit. The Apple iPhone 8 takes a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a back-facing camera with a much lower resolution and a lower 3840x2160 video quality, it also counts with a bigger camera aperture.
The iPhone 8 features a lot bigger memory to store more apps and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage. Motorola DROID Turbo features a superior battery performance than iPhone 8, because it has a 114% bigger battery size.
Although iPhone 8 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save some money, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a few specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.