Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 84.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Apple |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-09-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.20 x 3.05 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Gold, Silver and Space gray |
| -- | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 1099.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2688 x 1242 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 456 pixels per inch |
| -- | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.54 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3179mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The iPhone XS Max has a score of 84.5, which is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo's general score of 77.9. Even though iPhone XS Max is somewhat heavier than Motorola DROID Turbo, it's notably thinner and also way newer. Motorola DROID Turbo features a slightly better display than Apple iPhone XS Max, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a little bit greater pixel count in each inch in the display and a bit higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Motorola DROID Turbo and iPhone XS Max have very similar storage capacity to install applications and games, both of them have equal internal memory. The iPhone XS Max has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an additional graphics processor, it also counts with a larger number of cores (although slower), a 64-bit processor and more RAM.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with longer battery life than iPhone XS Max, because it has 3900mAh of battery capacity. IPhone XS Max features a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a worse video resolution and a much lower resolution back facing camera, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Although Apple iPhone XS Max is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Apple iPhone XS Max, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.