Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2017-10-19 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 5.74 x 2.74 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and White |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 129.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 2700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 4.64 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Google Pixel 2 has a score of 81.6, which is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 general score. Google Pixel 2 is a noticeably newer phone, and it's also somewhat lighter and way thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo. The Motorola DROID Turbo has a little bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2, because although it has an inferior number of cores and a smaller amount of RAM, it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a more vivid screen than Google Pixel 2, because it has a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution, a higher pixels count per screen inch and a bit bigger screen. The Motorola DROID Turbo shoots a bit better photographs and videos than Google Pixel 2, because although it has lower 24 fps video frame rates and a smaller camera aperture which is worse for shooting photos and video in low light situations, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a much higher resolution camera.
Google Pixel 2 counts with a much greater storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal memory. Motorola DROID Turbo has a way better battery lifetime than Google Pixel 2, because it has a 44% more battery size.
Google Pixel 2 is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also the cheapest one, making it a simple decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.