Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2016-10-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.09 x 2.98 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue and Gray |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 869.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.54 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.30 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3450mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Google Pixel XL is a little bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a global score of 81.3 against 77.9. Google Pixel XL is a newer cellphone, and it's also just a bit lighter and much thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a little better hardware performance than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, and they both have 4 cores, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with an extra graphics co-processor.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a better looking display than Google Pixel XL, because although it has a little smaller display, and they both have the same exact resolution of 2560 x 1440, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a bit greater screen density. The Google Pixel XL counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a little better battery lifetime than Google Pixel XL, because it has a 13 percent greater battery size. Motorola DROID Turbo features a slightly better camera than Google Pixel XL, because although it has slower 24 fps video frame rates, and they both have the same video quality and a F2 diafragm aperture, the Motorola DROID Turbo also counts with a camera with way more mega pixels.
Although Google Pixel XL is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you need that extra features, you can buy Google Pixel XL, otherwise you can save some money and buy the Motorola DROID Turbo, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.