Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 83.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | LG |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-05-10 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.27 x 3.00 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Aurora black |
| -- | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | $ 243.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| AMOLED | OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The LG V50 ThinQ is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, with a general score of 83.7 against 77.9. Both devices in this comparison use Android OS (operating system), but LG V50 ThinQ has 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version. LG V50 ThinQ's body is newer and incredibly thinner, but also just a little bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better hardware performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has doesn't have an extra GPU, it also counts with a greater number of cores and more RAM memory. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a better display than LG V50 ThinQ, because although it has a bit smaller screen and a bit lower 2560 x 1440px resolution, it also counts with a little higher pixels density.
The LG V50 ThinQ counts with a lot bigger storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a SD card slot that allows up to 1,95 TB and 128 GB internal storage capacity. LG V50 ThinQ counts with a bit better battery duration than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 4000mAh of battery capacity instead of 3900mAh.
The LG V50 ThinQ features a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, because although it has a way worse resolution back camera and a lower video definition, it also counts with a much bigger aperture to take better photography and videos in low-light situations.
Although LG V50 ThinQ is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can buy Motorola DROID Turbo, giving up a few features and specifications, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.