Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 14 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2024-08-08 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.33 x 2.85 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Jungle Green, Koala Gray and Peach Fuzz |
| -- | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2712 x 1220 pixels |
| AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 444 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1600 cd/m2 brightness |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 AE (4 nm) chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.54 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.64 inches (1/1.56") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Motorola Edge 50 has a global score of 81.2, which is slightly better than Motorola DROID Turbo's 77.9 global score. The Motorola Edge 50 design is a lot newer and notably thinner than Motorola DROID Turbo's, but it is a little bit heavier. Both phones in our current comparison include Android operating system, but Motorola Edge 50 has the previous 14 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has just a bit better screen than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a greater display pixels density and a slightly better resolution of 2560 x 1440. Motorola DROID Turbo features an extremely better processor than Motorola Edge 50, because although it has an inferior number of cores and 5 GB less RAM memory, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Motorola Edge 50 features a superior camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Edge 50 also has a bigger camera aperture to take better captures and videos in low light environments, higher video frame rates and a lot more megapixels camera in the back.
The Motorola Edge 50 counts with a much greater memory to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has 192 GB more internal storage. Motorola Edge 50 has greater battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 28 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.