Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 79.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Motorola |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.24 x 2.98 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Mystic indigo |
| -- | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | $ 300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Moto G Stylus is a bit better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, getting a 79.7 score against 77.9. Both phones we compare here have Android operating system, but the Moto G Stylus has an older 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4. Even though Moto G Stylus is a bit heavier than the Motorola DROID Turbo, it's thinner and also notably newer.
Motorola DROID Turbo features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola Moto G Stylus, because although it has 4 less cores and a lower amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU. Motorola DROID Turbo features a lot better display than Moto G Stylus, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440 pixels.
Moto G Stylus counts with much more memory to store more games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a slot for SD memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB and 128 GB internal memory capacity. Moto G Stylus has a bit superior battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 3% more battery size.
Motorola Moto G Stylus shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same 3840x2160 video resolution, the Motorola Moto G Stylus also has a larger diafragm aperture to take better captures and videos in low-light environments, higher video frame rate and a back facing camera with much more mega pixels.
Although Moto G Stylus is a better device, it costs a lot more than Motorola DROID Turbo, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola DROID Turbo. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Moto G Stylus, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the Motorola DROID Turbo, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.