Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 10 |
| 2014-10-28 | 2020-12-21 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.46 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | LCD |
| 565 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A12 is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo, having a overall score of 80.3 against 77.9. Galaxy A12 is a incredibly newer and a lot thinner device than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it is heavier. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS, but the Galaxy A12 has 10 version while Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4.
Motorola DROID Turbo has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A12, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and 4 less cpu cores , it also counts with an additional graphics processing unit. Motorola DROID Turbo features a lot better screen than Galaxy A12, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a lot better 2560 x 1440 resolution and a way greater quantity of pixels per screen inch.
Galaxy A12 has a little bit better camera than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have a F2 camera aperture and the same (Full HD) video definition, the Galaxy A12 also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels and higher video frame rate. The Samsung Galaxy A12 features a much better storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have equal 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Samsung Galaxy A12 also has a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB.
Galaxy A12 features longer battery life than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 28% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.