Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android |
| 2014-10-28 | 2021-01-22 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.46 x 3.00 x 0.36 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 7.23 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Awesome black, Awesome blue, Awesome violet and Awesome white |
| -- | Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| AMOLED | TFT |
| 565 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76 and Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A32 has a global score of 84.7, which is slightly better than the Motorola DROID Turbo's score of 77.9. The Galaxy A32 works with Android OS, and Motorola DROID Turbo comes with Android 4.4.4 OS. The Galaxy A32 is a extremely newer and somewhat thinner device than the Motorola DROID Turbo, but it's heavier.
The Motorola DROID Turbo has a lot better display than Galaxy A32, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a much greater display density and a much better resolution of 2560 x 1440. Samsung Galaxy A32 features much more storage capacity for applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal memory, the Samsung Galaxy A32 also has a SD extension slot that allows up to 1 TB.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a little bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy A32, because although it has a lower amount of RAM and an inferior number of cores , it also counts with an extra graphics processor. The Samsung Galaxy A32 counts with longer battery performance than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size instead of 3900mAh.
The Galaxy A32 takes just a bit better pictures and videos than Motorola DROID Turbo, and although they both have the same video quality, the Galaxy A32 also has a lot more megapixels camera, a larger diafragm aperture and better 30 frames per second video frame rates.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.