Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 82.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2014-10-28 | 2019-06-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | Cocktail Orange, Daybreak Black and Seawater Blue |
| -- | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SDM675 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 7.7 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3400mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A60 is just a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, getting an 82.3 score against 77.9. The Galaxy A60 body is way newer, way thinner and a little bit lighter than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Both devices we compare here come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy A60 has 11 version and Motorola DROID Turbo has Android 4.4.4 version.
The Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A60, because although it has an inferior number of cores (although they are faster) and a smaller amount of RAM memory, it also counts with a GPU. The Motorola DROID Turbo features a better looking screen than Galaxy A60, because although it has a quite smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 2560 x 1440.
Samsung Galaxy A60 has a much greater storage for games and applications than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has more internal storage capacity. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with just a bit longer battery duration than Galaxy A60, because it has a 15 percent greater battery size. Samsung Galaxy A60's camera is very similar to the Motorola DROID Turbo one, because although the Samsung Galaxy A60 has a lower video resolution and a back facing camera with much less megapixels, it also counts with a bigger diafragm aperture.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.