Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 77.9 | 84.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Motorola | Samsung |
| Android 4.4.4 | -- |
| 2014-10-28 | 2018-10-20 |
| 5.65 x 2.89 x 0.44 inches | 6.29 x 3.02 x 0.30 inches |
| 6.21 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black and Blue | 16 777 216 |
| -- | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 135.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 565 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| Capacitive, Multi-touch | No touch screen |
| 9.7 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 APQ8084 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Krait 450 (Quad-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 420 (500 MHz) GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.54 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 7.7 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 20.70 MP + 2.00 MP | 24.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/2.00 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (24 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 9.9 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE (4G), HSPA, UMTS, EV-DO A, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 3900mAh Battery | 3300mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 5.84 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 4.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Infra-red port | -- |
| -- | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A7 (2018) is a bit better than Motorola DROID Turbo, with a score of 84.2 against 77.9. The Galaxy A7 (2018) is a extremely newer cellphone, and it is also a little lighter and thinner than the Motorola DROID Turbo. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has an inferior number of cores and 3 GB lesser RAM, it also counts with an extra graphics processor.
The Motorola DROID Turbo features a sharper display than Galaxy A7 (2018), because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a higher pixels density and a higher 2560 x 1440px resolution. Galaxy A7 (2018) and Motorola DROID Turbo feature incredibly similar cameras, and although the Galaxy A7 (2018) has a larger aperture, a back camera with a better 24 mega pixels resolution and better video frame rates, they both have the same (Full HD) video quality.
The Galaxy A7 (2018) has a lot bigger memory capacity to install applications and games than Motorola DROID Turbo, because it has an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Motorola DROID Turbo counts with improved battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2018), because it has an 18 percent more battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.